performance NAT versus DR ?
mack at ncifcrf.gov
Sun Jan 28 12:49:07 GMT 2001
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Alois Treindl wrote:
> I have read the (excellent!!!) HOWTO and mini-HOWTO, but they are not clear
> on this
> point. The potential performance problem with NAT is discussed, but not for
> DR in a configuration with a dual-interface directory. It is mentioned that
> a DR cluster will
> also have performance penalties when the return path goes through the
> director, but no
> comparison with NAT performance is made.
There is a detailed comparison of VS-NAT and VS-DR (and others)
performance on the Documents page.
Joseph Mack mack at ncifcrf.gov
More information about the lvs-users