simple feature request

[Peter Mueller]

the main thing is the ordering of real servers.  sometimes I'm looking for a
particular one and it takes a bit to find one, especially with 30+ listed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wensong Zhang
To: Linux Virtual Server Mailing List
Sent: 11/7/2001 4:54 AM
Subject: Re: simple feature request



On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Peter Mueller wrote:

> hi gang,
>
> can ipvsadm -L output for each VIP be listed in ascending/descending
order
> somehow?  specifically, hostname order & connections
(total/active/inact)?

No. But, ipvsadm on kernel 2.4 can list a service only by
	ipvsadm -L [-n] -t|u|f service-address

I wonder if it is necessary to list each service in ascending/descending
order, although it is do-able. In most applications, there are few
virtual
services at a load balancer.

Regards,

Wensong

> If not, maybe I can contribute my first open source patch in my oh so
> copious spare time? :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>


_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users