extending NAT

Serge Sozonoff serge at globalbeach.com
Thu May 2 15:22:37 BST 2002


Yes I think Cisco Local Director uses this. I was once trying to get LVS to emulate this behavior so that I could transparently swap out the LD for the Linux LVS box.
I was playing around with bridging and all that to try and get it to work.
I was never fully successful, please keep me posted if someone progresses with this.

Thanks, Serge

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Mack [mailto:mack.joseph at epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 13:45
To: lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org; wayne at compute-aid.com;
taozhao at cs.nyu.edu
Subject: Re: extending NAT

Wayne wrote:

> >Server->Director->Client: address pair (SIP, DIP) is changed to (DIP, CIP).
> Do you have to allocate a table for tracking these changes, too?
> That will further slow down the director.

I talked to Wensong about this in the early days of LVS, but I remember
thinking that keeping track of the CIP would have been a lot of work.
I think I mentioned it in the HOWTO for a while. 
However I'd be happy to use the code if someone else wrote it :-)

Some commercial load balancers seem to have some NAT like scheme where
the packets can return directly to the CIP without going through the director.
Does anyone know how it works? (Actually I don't know whether it's NAT-like
or not, I think there's some scheme out there that isn't VS-DR which 
returns packets directly from the realservers to the clients - this
is called "direct server return" in the commercial world).

Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph at epa.gov ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

More information about the lvs-users mailing list