anyone used director failover in production?
rkagan at YorkU.CA
Thu May 23 13:15:21 BST 2002
Keepalived with lvs. Not that hard to setup actually.
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Intermediate System Administrator
rkagan at yorku.ca
On Thu, 23 May 2002, [iso-8859-1] Sébastien Bonnet wrote:
> > Does anyone have director failover in a production setup, when
> > directors have failed and changed over automatically and you've
> > only found out about it when the failover mechanism notified
> > you (rather than the customers notifying you)?
> I am in a process to install a web cluster (Apache + PHP + Tomcat4) using
> two directors. I'll be able to give you more information once it will be in
> production (in a few weeks).
> I plan on installing RedHat (lastest stable redhat kernel and lastest stable
> IPVS) + Piranha on directors and RedHat (+ hidden patch) on realservers. We
> may have some W2K boxes.
> We will be using direct routing. And as I'm pretty satisfied by the local
> node feature, the active director will also be used as a real server.
> Unfortunately, using the inactive director as a RS is always a mess,
> whatever network topology you choose.
> Sébastien Bonnet
> Centre de contacts - Experian France
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
More information about the lvs-users