firewall + loadbalancer on the same machine
aghaffar at developer.ch
Tue Aug 3 13:28:12 BST 2004
Roberto Nibali wrote:
> Is this clear enough or does it raise more questions? We would like to
> know so we can improve on the documentation.
Thanks for the link. I will read it and give you back my feedback.
For some reason, I did not see that page before. Or perhaps it is newer
than I last read the docs. (~ 6 months ago, when we implemented lvs)
> Out of the box it does not work, correct. But patches exist to make it
> work. You seem to have neglected to mention
> a) your kernel version
> b) your LVS forwarding method
We are using 2.4.22xx kernel from SuSE Linux 9.0 (Will change to RHEL 3
The LVS Forwarding method is NAT
> both points have different outcomes in answering your question to its
> full extent. 2 examples, randomly picked:
> LVS-NAT with the nfct patch will work for 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernels
> regarding filtering, iif you don't use fwmark
Thanks. I will try that.
More information about the lvs-users