Compared performances fwm vs masq
Horms
horms at verge.net.au
Sat Jun 19 03:26:33 BST 2004
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:22:12PM +0200, Guillaume Arcas wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'd like to know if there is any serious performance difference for using
> fwmark instead of masquerade method for load-balancing (DR not applicable
> in my case).
I do not understand your question.
MASQ and DR are forwarding mechanisms.
They can both be used with fwmark virtual services.
Or the more regular ipaddress:port virtual services.
There shouldn't be a performance impact in using fwmarks.
--
Horms
More information about the lvs-users
mailing list