'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated)
Jari.Takkala at Q9.com
Tue Aug 16 16:00:11 BST 2005
Thank you for your help Joe. We won't be able to move to 2.6 for at least another few months. The problem is occurring in a production environment. We have tried failing over the load balancer to the secondary, the same problem occurred on it. We also cleaned up and minimized the configuration as much as necessary. Still having the same problem the moment we begin load balancing FTP connections.
Hoping that Julian or someone will have an answer for us. Thanks!
From: lvs-users-bounces at LinuxVirtualServer.org
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces at LinuxVirtualServer.org]On Behalf Of Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:41 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Cc: ja at ssi.bg
Subject: RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not
I'm on vacation for a week. I can't look at my old e-mail
messages till I get back to work.
Julian: do you know how to solve the SYN+ACK problem with
LVS-NAT on 2.4.x?
are you up for going to 2.6? This will be a bit of work and
I'm not sure that it will solve the problem.
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
More information about the lvs-users