LVS and RedHat Cluster Suite differences

[Subhankar Sengupta]

Hi,
  using heartbeat it is very much possible to set up active/active cluster what
  you need is GFS. LVS is a diffren thing it is releated to load balancing using
  director.
  Rgds
  Subho Sengupta(Black Pigeon)

Ben Hollingsworth <ben.hollingsworth at bryanlgh.org> wrote:
  My company, whose Linux flavor of choice is RHEL, will be setting up a 
load balanced cluster soon. I've setup a couple HA servers using older 
versions of heartbeat, but I've never messed with LVS for an 
active/active cluster. What, if anything, is the difference between 
stock LVS and RedHat Cluster Suite? I'm assuming that RHCS is based on 
LVS. Have they added anything, or did they merely slap their own name 
on it and start charging extra for support? Anybody out there got any 
first-hand experience with both LVS & RHCS? Any input would be greatly 
appreciated.

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of the original message.

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.