max persistance time?

Joseph T. Duncan duncan at engr.orst.edu
Thu Aug 31 22:56:09 BST 2006


>> also I dont know how to test for an idle connection on the director...
>
> not much hope there unless you can do L7 (I don't know what L7 will look for, 
> the absence of a clean disconnect?). However as Malcom says in the L7 section 
> of the HOWTO, L7 should be done by the application, that's what the 
> application is for.

microsoft has a built in "network load balanceing" that is based purly on 
network traffic between boxes. to make it more robust they have something 
called "session directory" that up an authentication/identification will 
redirect an incomeing comm to the approprate box in the "network load 
balanceing cluster"

this style of load balanceing is fine for certian applications, and is 
closer to an L7 approtch as where your session is being proccessed is 
determined by your login/id instead of where your connection(s) are 
comeing from.

it also does this by being pretty stupid and assumes you have a crapton of 
bandwidth. As each box participateing in a "network load balanceing" setup 
recieves a copy of everything and has to pick out what it is gona 
proccess... (all machines participateing get a fake slaved mac address and 
ip shared between them)(shared mac address being m$'s solution to the arp 
problem?? i dunno)

however for terminal servers it is no good.. I need to account for %free 
cpu and %free memory as improtant metics. (ie 1 real server with 400% load 
(4xcpu at 100%) and 30kbs network traffic with 4 users, 1 real server with 
80% load and 900kbs traffic with 10 users.. i would want new users to 
land on the lower cpu load server as i am not really bandwidth bound tell 
i get above 1gb/sec (and if i hit that i have other problems) but the 
windows way does not take any cpu/memory metrics into account)

-- 
expenisve 10k~ L7 routers have liecensed the spendy tech and do offer 
some level of intigration with the m$ sesion directory to handle moveing a 
user (instead of the same ip) back to the real server they are on.

maybe i have a miss-understanding of how the L7-lvs stuff works but at 
least right now i dont see how it would be possible :/
--

lvs-dr is a pretty good fit sence i can use weight tables to adjust where 
people land based on my own userland metrics altering the weight tables..

Terminal Services does lend itself favorably to a lvs-dr approach. 
Incomeing traffic to the director consists of mostly keyboard and mouse 
movement operations (only ocationaly does it spike if someone uploads a 
file) so it is fairly light traffic. where outbound traffic is fairly 
large but sent directly from real server to client (pushing out bitmap 
updates of what the users desktop looks like)


>> there is a windows management tool that reports idle time but I am not 
>> aware of mib/snmp way to export that information
>
> so you have two problems
>
> o keeping up idle (or backgrounded) sessions that arise from a clean 
> disconnect. You should be able to keep these open for any large time (eg 
> weeks) if they aren't using any significant resources.
>
> o killing 100% CPU sessions from a dirty disconnect.
>
> does the application know whether the client has done a clean disconnect or 
> not? I assume no or else you wouldn't be posting at all.

correct. The terminal server session does not know weather a disconnect is 
clean or not. All it does is start recording idle time from the last 
keybaord/mouse input received

applications running inside the terminal server session (ie m$ word) 
usually have no idea what the diffrance between a terminal server session 
and a normal desktop is.

>
> What does the app vendor say about this problem?

M$'s documents are, use session directory and nlb. if you grow beyound 
that buy one of these $$$ products.. ;p if only i had a random 10~20k 
laying around...

> How do you handle the problem when there is no LVS?

I only had a single terminal server. So if a user had a dirty exit then 
either at 1 day of idle time they were killed off. Or if they reconnected, 
they got their session back.


_________________________________________________________________________
Info:                           Email:
Joseph T. Duncan                duncan at engr.orst.edu
109 Kidder Hall
Corvalis Or 97333


Search lvs-users Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort

More information about the lvs-users mailing list