Is LVS still alive?

[David Lang]

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, howard chen wrote:

> On 12/5/06, David Lang <dlang at digitalinsight.com> wrote:
>> LVS has been merged into the main kernel so there is no longer a need for
>> seperate releases.
>> 
>> it's still alive and still getting updates, but in the normal kernel
>> development, not as a seperate patchset.
>> 
>> David Lang
>> 
>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, howard chen wrote:
>> 
>> > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:55:38 +0800
>> > From: howard chen <howachen at gmail.com>
>> > Reply-To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
>> >     <lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org>
>> > To: lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> > Subject: Is LVS still alive?
>> >
>> > the latest release was back to 24-Dec-2004, so I want to ask if  LVS
>> > is still alive and continue developing?
>> >
>> > or in fact thet LVS is VERY mature enough?
>> >
>> > Thanks...
>> 
>
> if i want to look at the latest development source, where can i find it?

I don't follow the LVS development closely enough to say, the patches end up in 
the main kernel -rc kernels, but i don't know where development prior to this 
takes place.

David Lang