LVS + keepalived problem

[Brett Elliott]

If it found 2.4.20 it did not find the correct version.h. Also make
sure to build the kernel so that it generates the version.h - it's not
there in the source, it must be built. And the sym link must be
correct, use the .i686 directory. Run strace -f on the configure and
look for the open() call that loads in the version.h. It should tell
you where it is looking for it and where it found it.



On 12/7/06, Navid Rahimi <navid.rahimi at gmail.com> wrote:
> I actually did have a symlink from 2.6.9 to /usr/src/linux before I ran it.
> so it should have found the correct version.h no?
>
>
> On 12/7/06, Brett Elliott < brettelliott at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ahah, I just ran into this problem.
> >
> > Notice this:
> >
> > % cat /usr/include/linux/version.h
> > #define UTS_RELEASE "2.4.20"
> >
> > The configure script first looks in /usr/src/linux for version.h then
> > it looks in /usr/include. Try running
> >
> > rpmbuild -bp --target i686 kernel-2.6.spec
> >
> > That should generate version.h. Then do a sym link:
> >
> > ln -s /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.16/linux-2.6.16.i686 /usr/src/linux
> >
> > Run configure again and it should see that you're using the 2.6 kernel.
> >
> > On 12/7/06, Navid Rahimi <navid.rahimi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the reply...I do have all the modues. I found my
> problem....there
> > > seems to be a problem in the spec file or how rpms are built, not sure
> who
> > > to blame here.  I originally ran ./configure and made sure every thing
> was
> > > ok then built the rpms and installed it...after carefully reviewing the
> > > rpmbuild output i noticed that it thinks i have kernel 2.4.20 while i
> have
> > > 2.6.9. then it couldn't find some of the libraries and thus it didn't
> > > include ipvs support. the moral of the story: don't build the rpm!
> > >
> > > Navid
> > >
> > > On 12/6/06, J.Libak at sh.cvut.cz <J.Libak at sh.cvut.cz> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Navid Rahimi wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am running RHEL4 ( 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp), ipvsadm v1.24, keepalived
> > > > > v1.1.13.
> > > > > I can get virtual ip addresses to fail-over but when I add a virtual
> > > > > service
> > > > > nothing gets added to LVS, ipvsadm -L shows nothing. I compiled both
> > > > > ipvsadm
> > > > > and keepalived from source. During the compliation I did make sure
> IPVS
> > > > > framework/sync daemon support were enabled.  Yet no virtual services
> > > > > show up
> > > > > in ipvsadm. I am trying to setup a streamlined ha/load balancer i.e.
> > > > > the LVS
> > > > > router and real servers are the same.
> > > > > VIP: 10.1.1.100
> > > > > LVS routers/real servers :10.1.1.20, 10.1.1.30
> > > > >
> > > > > Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Navid
> > > > Did you load the ip_vs module and other ip_vs_* modules? Does lsmod
> show
> > > > them?
> > > > Did you use ipvsadm -A ... to add a new service?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give."
> > > -Sir Winston Churchill (1874 - 1965)
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
> lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> > > Send requests to
> lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> > > or go to
> http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> "We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give."
> -Sir Winston Churchill (1874 - 1965)