LVS/TUN MTU problem, missing hints in documentation
Joseph Mack NA3T
jmack at wm7d.net
Thu Dec 7 22:13:18 GMT 2006
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, jarol1 at seznam.cz wrote:
> Today I ran into problem of MTU in LVS/Tunneling.
>
> Small packets were forwarded to real servers without problems, but the bigger
> ones weren't and TCP retransmissions occurred. I noticed the problem
> dissapeared when I switched to LVS/DR so this gave me hint to where the
> problem might be. MTU 1480 had to be set on the outgoing interface of
> realservers with tunl0 having standard 1500. Directors have 1500 on all
> interfaces. This way TCP syn ack contained correct MTU and client didn't send
> big packets that were discarded on director anymore. IP header is 20 bytes
> long so 1480 is the maximum value that works.
>
> It isn't mentioned in documentation that this problem will occur if tunneling
> is used
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-Tun.html#MTU
This was a hard problem to figure out and solve. People
worked on this for about 2yrs before finding a satisfactory
solution. The problem is that the ipip code in Linux doesn't
handle fragmentation (or handle it properly).
You did well to come up with a solution in one go.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
Search lvs-users Archives
More information about the lvs-users
mailing list