LVS-NAT + SNAT is it impossible?

[Paulo F. Andrade]

On 2006/07/13, at 09:43, Graeme Fowler wrote:

> Paolo
>
> On 11/07/2006 17:23, Paulo F. Andrade wrote:
>> That's not quite what i'm looking for.
>> What I want is the following:
>> - for inbound connections i want packets with CIP->VIP translate  
>> to DIP->RIP
>> - for outbound connections (the responses from the real servers)  
>> packets with RIP->DIP translate to VIP->CIP
>
> Let me get this straight: you want the client connections to be  
> SNATted on the way out of the director towards to realserver so  
> that they appear to come from the director, not the client; then on  
> the way back you want them to be both SNATted and DNATted so the  
> response to the client comes from the VIP?
>

Yes!
> Surely what you're asking for is a proxy rather than a director?

Well, yes! But a proxy with a flexible load balancing.
I currently have a solution that works. I just wanted to know if this  
was possible. I guess not :).

>
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users