Persistence vs SH scheduler

[Francisco Gimeno]

> Given the high quality of all the other LVS code I wouldn't jump to the
> conclusion that the SH scheduler doesn't work for production sites.
Well.. I had tested several of the schedulers in a production environment..  I 
tried to balance 7 proxies cache, with a 200mbit/s traffic  ( balancer gets 
around 20mbit/s in DR mode ). 
With SH we got several kernel panics... as it was in production I couln't look 
into it. That was with a 2.6.9 kernel... I haven't tested with 2.6.16 (17) 
kernel yet. 
>
> For a start SH gives exactly the same kind of response as persistence
> and it's layer 4 based on source hash...