fail-over as opposed to round-robin

[Sadique]

You don't need LVS for this setup. All that you need is two servers with
Hearbeat or KeepAlived- VRRPv2

ahall at madasafish.com wrote:

>Hi there,
>
>Can the LVS provide a fail-over type of redundancy, as well as a round-robin type?
>
>That is, if I have two servers in my virtual "pool" can I direct all traffic to
>just one server until it fails, and then all traffic will be directed to the
>other server?
>
>This is the configuration I would like, for I don't wish to round-robin requests
>across both servers in the pool.
>
>Is this possible?
>
>Thanks very much.
>
>
>
>
>---- - Madasafish - Voted Best Heavy Consumer Broadband Provider in the 2006 Internet Industry Awards http://www.madasafish.com/
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
>  
>