LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?

[Kristoffer Egefelt]

Hello,

>> Problem:
>> All mail looks like they come from the loadbalancer's primary ip.

>the client sends to the VIP; the reply must come from the VIP.

Thanks for your reply, but this is exactly the problem.
The reply don't come from the VIP, it comes from the loadbalancers primary
ipaddress.

It's like this:
Loadbalancer ip - 10.10.10.1
VIP - 10.10.10.2
Mailserver ip - 192.168.0.10

Mails from 192.168.0.10 originates from 10.10.10.1, I would like them to
originate from 10.10.10.2...

Thanks.

/Kristoffer


On 5/18/06, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack at wm7d.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:
>
> > Problem:
> > All mail looks like they come from the loadbalancer's primary ip.
>
> the client sends to the VIP; the reply must come from the
> VIP.
>
>
> With LVS-NAT you can associate a different name with each
> realserver.
>
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.services.single-port.html#http_checks
>
> look in the section on "indexing programs"
>
> Joe
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>