Is active-active LVS really capable of doubling theoretical bandwidth?

Joseph Mack NA3T jmack at wm7d.net
Fri Nov 3 13:07:17 GMT 2006


On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Michael Spiegle wrote:

> I did some reading on active-active and while I think its a great idea,
> I didn't quite understand how it was capable of doubling the throughput
> as mentioned in the PDF document.

Horms would be the final word on the matter, but he seems to 
be busy (hasn't popped up on the mailing list for a few 
weeks). I haven't read the Saru docs for a couple of years 
and you seem to have read them thoroughly and I assume 
you've got it right.

n active directors can handle n times the bandwidth, but you 
have to send it to them. You'll need 10GigE (or something 
like that) in front of them.

I didn't know that the directors had iptables rules infront 
of them to divide the work load. One of the requirements is 
to load balance and handle failover, so there must be at 
least two directors capable of handling any particular 
stream of traffic.

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!

Search lvs-users Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort

More information about the lvs-users mailing list