Director and Real servers on different networks
Joseph Mack NA3T
jmack at wm7d.net
Wed Oct 11 15:25:13 BST 2006
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Andre Nathan wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have an LVS-DR setup which is working correctly like this:
>
>
> +--------------+
> | LVS director |
> +--------------+
> / | \
> / | \
> / | \
> +---+ +---+
> | | | | ...
> +---+ +---+
> Real servers
>
>
> The director and the real servers are all on the same network (say,
> a.b.c.0/24) and share an IP address (say, a.b.c.d) for the load-balanced
> service.
I'll assume this means that all machines have the VIP=a.b.c.d
> Now, we're migrating to a new range of IPs (say, x.y.z.0/24). I've tried
> adding a new real server (which has its real IP on the new range, say,
> x.y.z.w) to the existing configuration (that is, added a.b.c.d as an
> address to a dummy interface).
I assume the director can route to the new network and that
you've added the VIP to the new realserver on dummy0
> The configuration seems to be working correctly (i.e., the connections
> are redirected to this new server). However, ipvsadm always reports the
> number of active connections as 0 for that server, and thus all new
> connections are being redirected to it, and none to the pre-existing
> servers (I'm using the wlc algorithm).
>
> Is this a supported configuration?
yes
> Is there some assumption made by ipvsadm on the servers
> being all on the same network,
no
> or that dummy interface addresses and real addresses must
> be on the same network?
no. the real addresses are usually private eg 192.168.1.0/24
while the VIP is a public IP.
This should work. I assume you've done something silly.
Quite what silly is may not be obvious though.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
Search lvs-users Archives
More information about the lvs-users
mailing list