ipvs + source nat
trietz at t-ipnet.net
Thu Oct 19 09:08:06 BST 2006
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> Sometimes we don't have an answer, sorry.
All right, i know that you can't track all upcoming problems. I just try
to give some details to isolate the problem.
> I don't see the source nat'ing in your original post, but since you're
> doing it have you read
Thats is my source nat'ing rule:
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j SNAT
Is there a difference between using masquerading or nat'ing?
Thanks for the link. Is the problem still existing on a director with
More information about the lvs-users