Traffic to a "dead" server

Todd Lyons tlyons at ivenue.com
Thu Oct 19 22:32:40 BST 2006


On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:29:13AM -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Casey Zacek wrote:
>
>>Correct me if I'm wrong, please, but I believe what should have
>>happened was that all traffic should be directed to the only remaining
>>active RS once the failed RS gets deleted.
>only new traffic. Read the HOWTO.

I'm missing something.  You're saying there is no difference between
setting the weight of a RS to 0 and deleting that RS?
-- 
Regards...		Todd
  We should not be building surveillance technology into standards.
  Law enforcement was not supposed to be easy.  Where it is easy, 
  it's called a police state.             -- Jeff Schiller on NANOG
Linux kernel 2.6.12-18mdksmp   2 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.53, 0.76


More information about the lvs-users mailing list