Problems with IPVS
mind at bi.lt
Fri Oct 20 14:17:37 BST 2006
>>> Sorry, not on my end. Something ate them in between. Could you upload
>>> them somewhere zipped?
> Yep, I got them. Funny, if you open them in konqueror, it tries to
> display the octets in the packets, resulting in a half-backed webpage
> :). Bloody konqueror is too smart!
So what are the results of investigation? ;)
>> Yes. Just not single proxy. netmask 255.255.0.3 and I'm load balancing
>> to 4 proxies.
> Have you considered iproute2 nat? We could get a similar functionality
> to LVS using stuff like:
> ip route add nat 192.168.1.1 via 18.104.22.168
> ip rule add nat 192.168.1.1 via 22.214.171.124
What's the advantage of such method against iptables DNAT?
More information about the lvs-users