Problems with IPVS
ratz at drugphish.ch
Sun Oct 22 09:12:31 BST 2006
>> Yep, I got them. Funny, if you open them in konqueror, it tries to
>> display the octets in the packets, resulting in a half-backed webpage
>> :). Bloody konqueror is too smart!
> So what are the results of investigation? ;)
Sorry, haven't been able to look at it yet. I've been moving houses and
I was involved in a car accident yesterday and today I've come down with
a cold. The laptop with the files is in the car cemetery and police
hasn't allowed me to go there yet.
>>> Yes. Just not single proxy. netmask 255.255.0.3 and I'm load
>>> balancing to 4 proxies.
>> Have you considered iproute2 nat? We could get a similar functionality
>> to LVS using stuff like:
>> ip route add nat 192.168.1.1 via 22.214.171.124
>> ip rule add nat 192.168.1.1 via 126.96.36.199
> What's the advantage of such method against iptables DNAT?
It's closer to LVS because it's tighter coupled into the routing
facility. I understand it better than netfilter code because it's
smaller and easier to debug. But that's just me ;).
Roberto Nibali, ratz
'[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc
More information about the lvs-users