Problems with IPVS

Roberto Nibali ratz at drugphish.ch
Sun Oct 22 09:12:31 BST 2006


>> Yep, I got them. Funny, if you open them in konqueror, it tries to 
>> display the octets in the packets, resulting in a half-backed webpage 
>> :). Bloody konqueror is too smart!
> 
>  So what are the results of investigation? ;)

Sorry, haven't been able to look at it yet. I've been moving houses and 
I was involved in a car accident yesterday and today I've come down with 
a cold. The laptop with the files is in the car cemetery and police 
hasn't allowed me to go there yet.

>>>  Yes. Just not single proxy. netmask 255.255.0.3 and I'm load 
>>> balancing to 4 proxies.
>>
>> Have you considered iproute2 nat? We could get a similar functionality 
>> to LVS using stuff like:
>>
>> ip route add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80
>> ip rule add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80
> 
>  What's the advantage of such method against iptables DNAT?

It's closer to LVS because it's tighter coupled into the routing 
facility. I understand it better than netfilter code because it's 
smaller and easier to debug. But that's just me ;).

Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
-- 
echo 
'[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc


More information about the lvs-users mailing list