[lvs-users] ultramonkey: High Capacity High Availability and LoadBalancing

[Mark]

You do not need a second director.
The second director is only there so that it can take over from the first one in case that one fails.
But you can get regular load-balancing and HA over just the two real servers to work with only one director as well.

MARK
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces at linuxvirtualserver.org 
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces at linuxvirtualserver.org] On Behalf Of j j
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 5:01 PM
> To: ultramonkey-users at ultramonkey.org; LinuxVirtualServer.org 
> users mailing list.
> Subject: [lvs-users] ultramonkey: High Capacity High 
> Availability and LoadBalancing
> 
> High Capacity High Availability and Load Balancing
> 
> I am trying to set this up:
> http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/hc-ha-lb-eg.html
> 
> Right now I have two real servers and 1 Linux Director.  Each machine
> has one network card.  The picture has 2 Linux Directors.  One master
> director and other one being secondary.
> 
> Can I still be able to get this structure running with 1 linux
> director and 2 real servers.  When I get an extra machine, I will
> convert it to second linux director.
> 
> Is it possible to get going as of now, with 1 linux director, 2 real
> servers for High Capacity High Availability and Load Balancing, 2nd
> imaginary linux director is already dead.
> 
> Or is it mandatory initially to have (2 linux director, 2 real
> servers) and then it's possible for 1 of linux director to go out.
> 
> Note: I do not want to set up load balancing with 1 linux director and
> 2 real servers (http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/lb-eg.html).
> 
> thanks.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>