[lvs-users] lvs-direct..stumped: arp or not to arp?

William Ottley williamottley at gmail.com
Sat Dec 29 14:01:43 GMT 2007


hmmm so you're saying that the LVS acts as a web gw?
that all the traffic goes back to the LVS and then to the client?
so i don't need to have a firewall and site-to-site?
Just make the LVS with 2 nics, iptables, and do LVS-TUN?

and well that's the other thing: where's a good howto on setting up a
TUN with LVS...what software, ipsec?, etc
I'm using centOS 5.1, but I could go to another distro, if its
specifically made for LVS...

On Dec 29, 2007 8:52 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack at wm7d.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> >>
> >> See, we need to "hide" all of the webservers from the internet
> so does everyone else, but the realservers are already
> hidden from the internet by the design of LVS
> Joe
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Morpheus: After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill
- the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you
want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and I
show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.

More information about the lvs-users mailing list