LVS vs HA Proxy

[howard chen]

If my need is :

1. DNS load balancing (RR)
2. IP hash based load balancing

LVS is recommended?

in fact, I think a modern server (e.g. P4 2.8GHZ, 512 MB RAM) is
already able to saturated 100MBPS running HA proxy?


Thanks.

On 2/2/07, Malcolm <lists at loadbalancer.org> wrote:
> howard chen wrote:
> >> From the HA Proxy page:
> >
> > It said:
> >
> > Linux Virtual Servers (LVS)
> > Very fast layer 3/4 load balancing merged in Linux 2.4 and 2.6
> > kernels. Should be coupled with Keepalived to monitor servers. This
> > generally is the solution embedded by default in most IP-based load
> > balancers.
> >