Antw: LVS-NAT

[Gustavo Mateus]

And about LVS-NAT?
Is it still the least scalable? How many RS is the limit?

Stephan Hendl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried a similiar configuration and got loss of performance once I enabled statefull inspection. ipvs and statefull are two things which one shouldn't use together!
>
> Stephan
>
>   
>>>> Gustavo Mateus <gustavo at gustavo.eti.br> schrieb am 26.02.2007 um 14:07 in
>>>>         
> Nachricht <45E2DB78.5040604 at gustavo.eti.br>:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> Probably this issue was already discussed here but I did not find the 
>> messages related.
>>
>> I'm creating a Active-Active structure to host several virtual servers 
>> with 2 directors. About 40 to 50 real servers will be connected to this 
>> 2 directors.
>> The idea is to use those guys as firewalls too, statefull, for common 
>> services (80, 443, 21, 25).
>> Because of that we need to use LVS-NAT for our load balancing solution.
>>
>> My questions are:
>> - LVS-NAT can handle 50 servers?
>> - Is it ok to use the director as a firewall too?
>>
>> The directors are very good servers - Dell pe1950 Intel Xeon  5110 Dual 
>> Core de 1.60 Ghz with 2 GB of ram ( we still have the possibility to put 
>> one more processor on each director)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gustavo
>> _______________________________________________
>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org 
>> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org 
>> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
>