Upgrade lo:0 conflict from heartbeat 1.2.3 to 2.0.7

Brent Jensen brent at jeneral.com
Wed Feb 28 09:16:16 GMT 2007


I have a cluster config for a master-master database, each with a slave:
Slave -- Master (primary) -- Master (secondary) -- Slave

I have a VIP for the primary master (read/write database) and another VIP 
for load balancing (both slaves and the secondary master).

I'm running the directors on the master servers. Therefore, all servers 
have lo:0 up.

Under version 1.2.3 and kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3 (redhat) things worked fine. 
Switching between the masters lo:0 seem to be preserved (I think). 
Therefore, load balancing worked on all 3 slaves (2 slaves, secondary master).

However, in version 2.0.7 and kernel 2.6.9-42.0.8, lo:0 disappears OR the 
VIP for the read server (eth0:1) does not get created if lo:0 exists. If 
lo:0 doesn't exist, eth0:1 gets created like it should. Both lo:0 and 
eth0:1 have the same IP (load balancing IP), therefore, it looks as though 
the VIP conflicts with lo:0.

I don't know if the configuration was correct under 1.2.3, but it worked 
flawlessly for over a year. Under version 2.0.7, there is no failover since 
the VIP doesn't get created for the load-balance IP or I have to manually 
start lo:0 (that's not failover!).

Haresources:
<host>  IPaddr::10.0.3.17/24/eth0
<host>  IPaddr::10.0.3.20/24/eth0

LDirector:
virtual = 10.0.3.20:3306
         real=10.0.3.13:3306 gate 12 

         real=10.0.3.21:3306 gate 13 

         real=10.0.3.23:3306 gate 12 

         fallback=127.0.0.1:3306 gate 1
         service=http
         checktype=negotiate
         protocol=tcp
         scheduler = wrr

lo:0:
DEVICE=lo:0
IPADDR=10.0.3.20
NETMASK=255.255.255.255
NETWORK=10.0.3.0
BROADCAST=10.0.3.255
ONBOOT=yes
NAME=loopback


What's different? Kernel? Heartbeat? Is there another config option to make 
it work?

Thanks.


Search lvs-users Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort

More information about the lvs-users mailing list