Reports of bad headers using TUN?

[Matthew Boehm]

> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Casey Zacek wrote:
> 
>> Joseph Mack NA3T wrote (at Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 03:43:26AM -0800):
>>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Matthew wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bam! That did it. I've gotten one response back from my 4 problematic
>>>> people and it works for her now.
>>>
>>> can you tell us what you did, so the next person doesn't
>>> have to figure it out?
>>
>> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-Tun.html#tunl_mtu_solved 
>>
>>
>>
>> That is, set tcp-mss via iptables on the realservers.
> 
> thanks
> 
> There's been several approaches to this
> 
> o setting the packet size for the route on the director
> 
> o setting the packet size for the interface on the director.
> 
> even though I wrote up the section you just posted, I didn't notice that 
> the command you ran was run on the realservers. I thought it was run on 
> the director.
> 
> So this was the only thing you needed to do? You didn't do anything on 
> the director?

	Nope. Didn't do anything to the director. I ran the iptable command on 
both realservers. Something to note regarding that POST test in the HOWTO:

	On IE6/7: When you submit the post, the page just reloads. No data posted.

	On Firefox/Netscape: You actually get a "Bad Request" page.

But after the "patch" was applied to the realservers, all browsers 
showed the POST data.

-Matthew