Reports of bad headers using TUN?
nigel at turbo10.com
Wed Jan 3 23:14:55 GMT 2007
>> Just got back one customer's response. Said the test page worked fine
>> for her.
> Scratch that. I misunderstood her. She sent a screen shot from Firefox and
> IE. IE7 simply reloaded the page but Firefox showed the "bad request" page.
> And the webserver logs on that node show this "request failed: error reading
> the headers,"
> So that means we know what the problem is now? We know that its packet
> fragmenting? I guess this one chick is behind some super-duper firewall
> that's not liking it?
> I am suposed to apply that iptable's rule onto the real servers right?
Yes. I think that's the plan. Let us know how it goes?
> Matthew wrote:
>> No because I wanted to check to see if that was indeed the case before
>> applying the fix. I read in the HOWTO that applying the iptable rule caused
>> other problems with other people.
>> Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Matthew wrote:
>>>> The fact that more people are having this issue is starting to worry me.
>>> did you apply the fix(es) in the HOWTO before you asked people to run the
>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
More information about the lvs-users