SNAT Confusion

[Rodre Ghorashi-Zadeh]

Then what functionality does the NFCT patch provide that the LVS-NAT doesn't 
out of the box?

~Rodre


>From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack at wm7d.net>
>Reply-To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
><lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org>
>To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
><lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org>
>CC: jkrzyszt at tis.icnet.pl
>Subject: Re: SNAT Confusion
>Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
>
>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Rodre Ghorashi-Zadeh wrote:
>
>>I understand that Julian's patch will not help me, but in trying to put an 
>>end to my confusion:
>>Doesn't the LVS-NAT automatically change the RIP source address back to 
>>the VIP address as it traverses the director by default (without the NFCT 
>>patch)?
>
>yes
>
>Joe
>
>--
>Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net 
>- azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml 
>Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

_________________________________________________________________
Your Space. Your Friends. Your Stories. Share your world with Windows Live 
Spaces. http://spaces.live.com/?mkt=en-ca