[lvs-users] LDAP failover

[Bruce Thompson]

Hi Sylvain,

Yes, we only have two machines, so that will be the case alright. We did
wonder whether that would be the problem. Thank you very much for confirming
it.

Regards,
Bruce

2008/4/29 Sylvain Viart <sylvain at easyrencontre.com>:

> Hi Bruce,
>
> Bruce Thompson a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have two directors which are also the real servers which host two
> > instances of LDAP (is it a problem for LVS to route to a local server
> I think it's the same problem, citation:
>
> If fact member of the LVS cannot use LVS.
>
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/mini-HOWTO/LVS-mini-HOWTO.html#gotchas
>
> > > To set up and test/run LVS, you need a minimum of 3 machines: client,
> > > director, realserver(s).
> > >
> > > From the outside, the LVS functions as one machine. The client cannot
> > > be one of the machines in the LVS (the director, or realserver). You
> > > need an outside client. If you try to access an LVS controlled service
> > > (eg http, smtp, telnet) from any of the machines in the LVS; access
> > > from the director will hang, access from a realserver will connect to
> > > the service locally, bypassing the LVS.
> >
> Is it your case?
>
> Does it work it you split on three physical distinct server?
>
> Regards,
> Sylvain.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>



-- 
m: +64 (0)21 962 085
h: +64 (0)4 384 8740
e: thompson.bj at gmail.com
skype: bjthompson