[lvs-users] Problems when combining TCP and UDP on the same port

Joseph Mack NA3T jmack at wm7d.net
Mon Feb 11 12:41:12 GMT 2008


On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Andrzej Lisowski wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes. In case when the server crashes both UDP and TCP ports are down.
> Please note that monitoring only on UDP with TCP removed from the config
> file results in correct ldirectord behavior i.e. the entry is removed
> after crash of the machine. Also restarting the ldirectord assures that
> UDP entry for crashed host is not present anymore. The point is that
> once a real server is placed in the routing list for UDP and UDP is
> combined with TCP on the same port than UDP entry is never removed from
> the list. TCP alone and UDP alone both result in correct behavior.

please edit your posts. All the material below this is 
irrelevent.

I understand from your first post that deleting the UDP 
entry works when there is no corresponding TCP entry. I'm 
trying to find out what goes wrong when you have both TCP 
and UDP on the same port. You didn't answer my question. 
What happens to the call to delete the UDP port when both 
TCP and UDP are forwarded by LVS?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!


Search lvs-users Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort

More information about the lvs-users mailing list