[lvs-users] Lvs for multi-site/subnet terminal services

Graeme Fowler graeme at graemef.net
Wed Jul 22 14:01:12 BST 2009

Hi Paul

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 08:53 -0400, Paul Dickson wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion.  Looking at the man page it it's exactly what I'm
> doing, the connection report shows.  I've tried tunnel, masq, and route.
> I've created the service with and without the netmask.  Any ideas?

Yes - don't use tunnelling. You're working with Windows machines, and
tunnelling is more difficult than it needs to be.

Do your realservers ( and in your message) use
the director as their default gateway, or not? That will dictate whether
you use NAT (masq) or DR (gate).


More information about the lvs-users mailing list