[lvs-users] LVS and stale connections

Malcolm Turnbull malcolm at loadbalancer.org
Tue Mar 31 15:15:55 BST 2009


Ignore me I didn't see the first post saying no health checker was being
used.


2009/3/31 Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm at loadbalancer.org>

> I've never heard of this being a problem? 1000 doesn't sound like a lot of
> stale connections?
> Is their some more info on this?
>
> I have customers doing 50K conns/second with no problems.
>
>
>
>
> 2009/3/31 <jason.faulkner at mailtrust.com>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Fabio Coatti" <cova at ferrara.linux.it>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:08am
>> To: lvs-users at linuxvirtualserver.org
>> Subject: [lvs-users] LVS and stale connections
>>
>> >say, after reboot a couple (out of five) of servers shows with ipvsadm -L
>> more
>> >than 1000 connections (and all of those are fake, as the Rservers have
>> been
>> >rebooted) and ipvs doesn't pass any new connection until the count lowers
>> >enough and only 3 servers are actually working.
>>
>>
>> We've seen this problem too; the only way I've found to clear that counter
>> is to pull a server from rotation and leave it pulled for 15-30 minutes.
>>
>> --
>> Jason Faulkner
>> Linux Systems Engineer
>> Mailtrust, a division of Rackspace
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
>> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>>
>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Malcolm Turnbull.
>
> Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
> Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
> http://www.loadbalancer.org/
>



-- 
Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull.

Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/



More information about the lvs-users mailing list