[lvs-users] LVS-DR on default gateway
michael at epoch.co.il
Wed Jan 20 15:57:25 GMT 2010
Is there problem with the way RedHat suggest?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:03 PM, L.S. Keijser <leon at linux.nl> wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 14:08 +0100, Dennis J. wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to set up a couple of realservers behind a
> > gateway/router/firewall and would like to put the LVS-DR config on that
> > machine too. In another setup I'm already running LVS-DR but there the
> > director is not sitting between the client and the realservers.
> > I've read the documentation and googled around and found that the
> > director/gateway combination only works with patches applied and some
> > additional non-standard configuration steps.
> > What I'm wondering is if there is an easier way to accomplish this now?
> > references I found on the web go all the way back to 2001 and talk about
> > 2.2 and 2.4 kernels so I'm not sure if the patches/hacks to make this
> > are still valid or if there is an easier way to accomplish this nowadays?
> I assume by all this you mean solving the ARP problem. If so, take a
> look at this section of the HOWTO which is specific on 2.6 kernels:
> In a nutshell: you don't need to patch anything, just set some proc
> values and bring up a loopback device (in that order).
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
More information about the lvs-users