[lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services

[Ferenc Wagner]

Sohgo Takeuchi <sohgo at sohgo.dyndns.org> writes:

> From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu>
>
>> I'm running ldirectord with
>> http://hg.linux-ha.org/agents/rev/6e8b562f5414 applied for better IPv6
>> support.  Basically, it works fine, thanks for implementing this.  But I
>> wonder whether there's a fundamental reason for not allowing IPv4 and
>> IPv6 virtual services with the same fwmark, like
>> 
>> virtual=1
>>   [...]
>> virtual6=1
>>   [...]
>> 
>> which results in
>> 
>> Error [21297] reading file /etc/ldirectord.cf at line 15: duplicate virtual server
>> 
>> if tried.  Is this only an overzealous sanity check in ldirectord, or
>> are iptables and ip6tables fwmarks actually related somehow?
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> When I enhanced the IPv6 support of ldirectord, I forgotten to
> take care about this case. I also think that ldirectord should
> support this case.

Great, and thanks for taking care of IPv6 support in ldirectord!
So what do you think about my patch?  Not that I feel strongly about
it, but I'd better stop using it if it's broken...
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.