[lvs-users] in ldirectord.cf, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Fri Jul 15 00:01:39 BST 2011

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 08:03:29AM -0700, Robinson, Eric wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > before upgrading I would check the source code to see if 
> > checkcount (or some other option) meets your requirements.
> > 
> Okay. That sees like an unusual suggestion. Usually the standard
> recommendation is to upgrade to the latest version, especially when the
> one in use is 5 years old. :-)

Just an idea as I got the feeling that an upgrade wouldn't bring
any other benefits to you.

More information about the lvs-users mailing list