[lvs-users] Ignoring ARP on *all* interfaces? Docs seem to say so

[L.S. Keijser]

On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 19:45 +0000, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > Some people will ignore ARP for all interfaces. This is wrong.
> 
> 	Most of the trivial LVS and non-LVS setups can work with
> all.arp_ignore = 1, that is how other networking stacks react to
> ARP requests - the requested address must be on same interface.
> It works when IPs from same subnet are configured only on one
> interface. LVS setups can use this restriction to configure VIPs
> on lo, dummy or any other interface that is different from
> the concerned interface with ARP traffic.

Of course. Was being too focused on only 0 / 1 as an option. Too
involved with another application, I'm afraid.

Sorry for the noise.

regards,

Léon