[lvs-users] SYN spiraling between master and slave IPVS balancers
dimak at stalker.com
Tue Mar 5 06:07:09 GMT 2013
On 2013-03-05 00:39, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Dmitry Akindinov wrote:
>> Thank you very much!
>> It's about ten days since we started to use on our servers kernel 3.8.0-28
>> (now 3.8.1-30) with your patch applied. So far, there are no signs of SYN
>> spiraling or other problems with using ipvs balancer nodes on our
>> multiprotocol real servers. It would be ver nice to have this feature in the
>> standard kernels.
> Yes, I'll do it in the next days.
> So, can I add your Tested-by in commit message?
It would be more right to add German Myzovsky <lawyer at sipnet.ru> as the
tester. I'm just the coordinator.
> And I assume your tests were with backup_only=1, right?
Yes, slave balancers set this flag to 1. In the case of a cluster
fail-over the newly elected master balancer clears that flag.
>> Best regards,
>> Dmitry Akindinov
> Julian Anastasov <ja at ssi.bg>
More information about the lvs-users