[lvs-users] about NAT return path
yhpeng at orange.fr
Mon Feb 2 09:59:51 GMT 2015
If it's just a DNAT forwarding for the incoming packet, I don't think
LVS host has to keep the status of the connection.
I am probably wrong, just by curious. And I will test for it.
Martin Wheldon wrote:
> Because there will be no entry in the NAT table on the second host so
> it won't know how to deal with the return packet.
> Best Regards
> On 2015-02-02 09:06, Yonghua Peng wrote:
>> Can you tell me why the realserver should use host A as the gateway?
>> since host A and B have the same configure, and share the same VIP, I
>> was thinking both A and B can be setup as the gateway.
>> Ivan Havlicek wrote:
>>> No, if a transaction start via LVS host A, the realserver need to
>>> this host as gateway to respond.
>>> This is the normal for a NAT.
>> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
>> lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-request at LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
More information about the lvs-users